Does the coincidence still work itself out?

One's power has always extended beyond man's hand, rising higher and higher above all his powers, thinking he can guide it. Those whose grace Mother Nature bestowed on him have long since lost their awe - a well-known phenomenon.

This appearance on the outside makes it shine from within, were it not for these doubters, whose will to correct is subject to wordless language. Nevertheless, even that which is doubted is rushed ahead by the thinking masses, the arrogance of the identified being, any answer to the question "Who am I?" has long been answered in the roles of everyday life.

A scientifically provable improvement within and outside of human affairs is by no means a guiding force for the intellectual spirit. Where would we end up if we were still tired of believing in the universal? The laws of nature have long been willingly subject to the progressive being, interspersed in everyday life. Humility correlates with submissiveness, wisdom with knowledge. Far from all traditional customs and traditions, giving no importance to rishis, too far away from the order of time. So long for speed and liveliness.  

If attention is paid to the doctrine of abundance, it has always been subject to an experience whose burden of proof in its question needs no answer. ...'that all abundance is to be found in the hereafter ...' says the Isha Upanishad, one of those poetic core texts of the Vedanta, regarded by various traditions within Hinduism as a scripture of revelation (Shruti). For Europeans, this is not a common doctrine, as this region is rather subject to the mature enlightenment of demonstrable logic. However, the path and goal of 'the strangely seen' is still to give all seekers the strength to realise the ancient teachings. If the spiritual mind fails at the word of language, it needs to leave this path of logic, which in itself clarifies everything that remains far from feeling. The call of modern times seems to be to give birth immediately to the realisation of what has been written.

Said Upanishad carries within it the introductory verse, in its translation on all sides: 'Om. The fullness is this, the fullness is that. From fullness comes fullness. If abundance is taken from abundance, then abundance remains. Om - peace, peace, peace'.

Perpetual existence. From what? To what destiny is it to be subject? When everything burns to ashes (man's hand drives his being), what remains? Fullness?

Does the fullness of abundance, of which only the stillness is aware, come together in the abstinence of the discerning mind? The deepening and 'leap out of all conceivability and logic' indicates the providence of original existence, a unity from which nothing can be taken away and nothing can be added. Experiencing all-encompassing consciousness is more a matter of coincidence than a burden of proof.